Email Printer Friendly
Minn. passes midlevel provider law
By Kathy Kincade, Editor in Chief

May 18, 2009 -- Minnesota has become the first state in the U.S. to pass legislation allowing the licensing of midlevel oral health providers.

“The passage of the legislation in Minnesota is truly historic.”
— Diann Bomkamp, R.D.H., B.S.D.H.,
     American Dental Hygienists'
     Association

The Minnesota House and Senate overwhelmingly passed Senate File 2083, a bill establishing the professions of dental therapist and advanced dental therapist provider. Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty signed the bill into law on May 16.

The bill was the culmination of nearly two years of work spearheaded by state Sen. Ann Lynch (D-Rochester). In its original form, the bill -- which was actually a combination of two separate pieces of legislation, one introduced by Rep. Kim Norton (D-Olmstead) and the other by Rep. Cy Thao (D-Ramsey) -- proposed the creation of two types of midlevel providers: oral health practitioners (OHPs) and dental therapists.

While some in the dental community were concerned that the educational requirements were not stringent enough, most opposed provisions in the bill that would have allowed the OHPs to fill or pull permanent teeth without the onsite supervision of a licensed dentist.

But last week, dental professionals and legislators reached a compromise, and the bill -- with revised language designed to address the education and scope-of-practice concerns -- quickly made its way through the House and Senate and onto Gov. Pawlenty's desk.

"This is really an exciting piece of legislation, not just for Minnesota but for the whole country," Sen. Lynch told DrBicuspid.com last week. "I feel we've done good work for Minnesota, but also that we've contributed to healthcare reform in this country."

"The leadership demonstrated by Sen. Lynch, Rep. Thao, and their colleagues who worked closely on this effort is to be commended," said Diann Bomkamp, R.D.H., B.S.D.H., president of the American Dental Hygienists' Association, in a press release issued today. "Forging consensus on workforce issues is never easy, but Minnesota is a demonstration to others throughout the country that solutions can be developed and implemented. The passage of the legislation in Minnesota is truly historic."

Copyright © 2009 DrBicuspid.com

Minnesota nears approval of midlevel providers, May 13, 2009

Univ. of MN says yes to midlevel providers , February 13, 2009

Minn. shapes future of midlevel providers, January 27, 2009

Minnesota hammers out regulations for superhygienists, October 29, 2008


Last Updated hh 5/7/2010 9:56:58 AM

57 comments so far ...
5/18/2009 3:32:55 PM
prodigal416
Why did the ADA not do anything and let this pass? The politicians had a field day. Now we're going back to the days of barber dentists. 
5/18/2009 4:01:25 PM
galevin
Un frecking believeable. I quit the ADA quite a while ago because of their lack of leadership.
I blame the ADA 110% for allowing this to happen. What state is next?
5/18/2009 5:52:46 PM
CBy
I too left the ADA a long time back for this exact reason.  They allowed amalgams to become an ugly word and bowed to "public" opinion, and now they allow this legislation to go into place.  They don't deserve the membership payments.  
5/18/2009 6:02:43 PM
kebbuggs
I LIVE IN GEORGIA, AND I GRIEVE FOR ALL YOU HARD WORKING DOCS IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. THIS IS A SLAP IN THE FACE TO ALL OF THOSE OVER THE PAST 40-50 YEARS WHO SLAVED TO MAKE DENTISTRY THE CREDIBLE ART/SCIENCE THAT IT IS TODAY.
THIS IS VERY DISTURBING NEWS!!!
5/18/2009 6:19:27 PM
Allan Farman
If you are opposed to the new "midlevel" dental practitioners then the place to record this is with your local ADA Trustee and with the President of the ADA. Maybe a resolution could be proposed before the ADA House of Delegates in Hawaii to the effect that the ADA House does not recognize this category of practitioner. My guess is that such a resolution would pass by a very substantial margin.

Perhaps the ADA leaderhip was blindsided by the educational and legislative communities in Minnesota. Without a mandate from the ADA House of Delegates it is difficult for them to react effectively.

Rather than avoiding the ADA, perhaps you should rejoin and run for office? That way your opinion could be heard.
 
I am personally opposed to the new category as I believe it will be a negative influence on dental treatment quality and also provides an unfulfilling profession to the folks duped into studying for this second class diploma. I also view it as eroding the value of all dental credentials from the institution concerned.
Email Printer Friendly

Sponsored By

|| 15 Minutes to Excellence || ADA News || Advertising || Ask Marty || Case Archives || Case Study || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || Education || Equipment For Sale || Facebook || Forums || Future of Dentistry || Home || Hygienist Resources || Jobs || Links || Mobile || News in Brief || Online CE || Opinion || Privacy Policy || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Video || XML/RSS ||

Copyright © 2013 DrBicuspid.com. All Rights Reserved.