Email Printer Friendly
State dental groups question dental therapist qualifications
By Donna Domino, Features Editor

December 8, 2010 -- As the W.K. Kellogg Foundation begins rolling out a $16 million initiative to help five states develop midlevel providers programs similar to the dental health aide therapist (DHAT) program in Alaska, dental associations in those states remain unconvinced that this approach will be safe and effective.

While they believe directly supervised therapists can do restorations, the organizations share concerns about allowing surgical procedures such as extractions and drilling.

Kellogg's Dental Therapist Project, announced November 17, is intended to support community-based efforts in Kansas, New Mexico, Ohio, Vermont, and Washington to add therapists to dental teams providing care in underserved areas.

The goal of the three-year project is to work with local dentists, community groups, policymakers, and consumer health advocates to build consensus about improving access to care, said project director David Jordan of Community Catalyst, a national nonprofit advocacy organization that is the project's lead grantee.

"We really want to work with dentists so they're able to shape and improve access to care," Jordan told DrBicuspid.com. "This is an effort to start conversations and build the infrastructure to elevate awareness that there are significant barriers for people to get dental care."

Noting that 49 million people live in areas where there is a shortage of dental professionals and there are no dentists in many counties and rural areas, he said the project will encourage dentists to support expanded functions for dental assistants.

A recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that nearly two-thirds of Medicaid children in the U.S. failed to get any dental care as recently as 2008. Some 30 million children were enrolled in the program that year.

The Kellogg initiative envisions a dental therapist who would undergo two years of technical training and then work under the general (offsite) supervision of a dentist. After getting a dentist's approval for treatments, therapists would be able to do routine extractions on mobile primary teeth and also perform restorations, including drilling, Jordan explained. Allowable extractions would not involve cutting below the gum line, he pointed out, so the procedure would not be invasive.

"They would be part of the dentist's team, and the dentist would certify their competency," he said.

Last year, Minnesota passed a law authorizing dental therapists to practice, including performing nonsurgical extractions, Jordan noted.

The dental therapist model first began in the 1920s in New Zealand and is now well-established in many developed countries, including the U.K., Australia, and the Netherlands.

In October, the Kellogg Foundation released an evaluation of Alaskan DHATs that found that these midlevel providers offer safe and competent care to residents of remote and underserved native communities.

"We're looking at an idea that has been proven and well-established," Jordan said.

Creating a two-tiered system?

But dental association officials of the five states slated for the new Kellogg program expressed concerns about allowing therapists -- who may be inadequately trained and unprepared to deal with complications that can arise even during "routine" procedures -- to perform extractions and restorations.

The Washington State Dental Association (WSDA) supports an Expanded Function Dental Auxiliary model that allows a supervised "dental extender" to place restorations but no extractions, and only after the dentist determines the diagnosis and treatment planning, according to Douglas Walsh, DDS, president of the WDA. More than 100 such workers have graduated and been licensed in Washington, and they are making a significant increase in access to care, he said.

“I think it's about turf, money, and fear.”
— Terry Batliner, DDS, Center for Native
     Oral Health Research

"We wouldn't oppose anything within reason if it were under the dentist's direct supervision," Dr. Walsh told DrBicuspid.com.

Sometimes situations arise that only a dentist with adequate training and experience is competent to handle, he said. For example, many young children squirm during drilling, which could have dangerous consequences.

"Drills rotate at 400,000 RPMs, and someone who's not well-trained could have problems with something spinning that fast in a kid's mouth who is moving around," Dr. Walsh noted. "There are huge challenges."

Low reimbursement rates and cutbacks in Medicaid and other funding are the biggest barriers to access to care, he said, noting that streamlining paperwork would make handling such cases easier.

Another access issue is getting the needy into dentists' offices. "The big question is: Is it demand or need?" Dr. Walsh said. "Dentists have done a very good job dealing with demand, but need is something else." Many who need care don't know how to navigate bureaucratic programs, he said.

Dr. Walsh also wonders who will pay for a therapist's services. "Our concern is: Is it economically viable to have them?" he said.

Thomas Matanzo, DDS, president of the Ohio Dental Association, echoed this sentiment. "Who will pay for DHATs to do this treatment?" he said in an interview with DrBicuspid.com. "I don't see where the money is coming from."

Alice Warner, Kellogg Foundation program officer, noted that the new healthcare reform law mandates dental care for children, and the Children's Health Insurance Program has guaranteed funding through 2015. Also, funds are being built into new state insurance exchanges, set to begin in 2014, that will enable low-income families to buy private insurance, she said.

And a report released December 6 by the Pew Center on the States contends that private practice dentists can improve both their productivity and profitability by adding dental hygienists and dental therapists to their teams.

Dr. Matanzo is also concerned about inadequately trained staffers doing irreversible procedures without a dentist's direct supervision. The Alaska model, which involves natives in remote, tribal villages, is a unique situation, he said. "That's not like anything we have in Ohio," he noted.

Ohio has long used expanded function assistants, who can place restorations under direct supervision.

Good care involves more than drilling and extractions, Dr. Matanzo noted, such as oral cancer evaluations, diagnosing infections in the mouth and jaw, reading radiographs, and treating abscesses and trauma. "There are many other functions in which patients would be given a false sense of security that their needs are being met," he said.

He believes DHATs would create a two-tiered system that would discriminate against people in different socioeconomic or ethnic groups with a model that is "unproven" and whose cost-effectiveness remains doubtful. "This is just jumping the gun," he said.

Risk of treatment complications

Robert Manzanares, DDS, president of the New Mexico Dental Association, shares Dr. Walsh's concerns about therapists doing surgical procedures, especially if complications arise during treatment.

"What happens if you have to go deep into a cavity and accidentally go into the pulp?" he asked, adding that there is no such thing as a simple extraction or an easy filling. "What are the ramifications? If an extraction is done prematurely, there can be spacing issues, and it can cause impacted permanent teeth. Something done poorly is worse than no care," he said.

Dr. Manzanares is familiar with the challenges facing underserved communities, having grown up in an impoverished area, worked in the National Health Service Corps, and now practices in a relatively poor area.

"I see the need and how people are hurting, but we need more dentists. We need more good solutions, not quick fixes," he said. "Do we have a shortage of dentists or maldistribution? The answer to both questions is yes in New Mexico."

He supports creating more incentives for dentists, including increasing Medicaid reimbursements, noting that 43% of New Mexico dentists take Medicaid patients. He also advocates creating community dental health coordinators -- a solution being investigated by the ADA -- who would go into schools and retirement homes and help people with transportation, language, and cultural issues.

Another possibility is a collaborative dental hygienist who could use teledentistry to communicate with a dentist and assess the patient, he said, which would allow dentists to be more efficient when the patient arrives for treatment.

Dr. Manzanares also supports having an expanded function dental auxiliary who would place restorations after the dentist has prepped the tooth.

"I can only support something based on quality," he said. "I have reservations about DHATs, and what I've heard does not sound like a good solution for New Mexico."

Kevin Robertson, executive director of the Kansas Dental Association, said his group wants to create a new level of hygienists who would provide palliative care but would not diagnose or do surgical procedures. "We do not believe it's appropriate training for the types of surgical services they would provide," he told DrBicuspid.com.

Peter Taylor, executive director for the Vermont State Dental Society, said his group has not taken a position on DHATs. "We have not drawn a line in the sand," he told DrBicuspid.com. "This is a broad problem, and I don't think any one answer is going to be the solution." He also recommended increasing state and federal Medicaid funding.

Dental Therapist Project Director Jordan believes that dentists' businesses will be enhanced by therapists' work.

"This is really about improving the ability of dentists to expand their reach," he said. "At the end of the day, it will mean more patients for the dentist because they'll be part of the practice, they can bill for their services, and it gives the dentist more flexibility to see and treat more patients."

What's the solution?

Despite these compelling arguments, there are dentists in the U.S. who support the dental therapist model. Terry Batliner, DDS, who has a private practice in Denver and is the associate director for the Center for Native Oral Health Research, part of the University of Colorado's School of Public Health, believes that properly trained dental therapists can safely do extractions.

"I think you can train people to competently remove mobile primary and permanent teeth and periodontally involved teeth that are loose because they're fairly easy to extract," he told DrBicuspid.com.

Dental therapists receive 3,000 hours of instruction in prepping and restoring teeth, he added -- more than dental schools require. "Dental therapists actually get more hours of training in prepping and restoring teeth than dental students," Dr. Batliner said.

"They've been doing it for several years in Alaska and many other countries, and it's been shown that the quality is no different than if a dentist does it within their scope of practice," he said. "I challenge anyone to identify a study that shows dental therapists anywhere have produced harm."

Critics who contend it would create a secondary system of inferior dental care for the poor should realize that is what we have now, he said.

"We have a two-tiered system now: People who have dental insurance or money can get access to high-quality dental care," Dr. Batliner said. "But the fact is that people who live in rural areas or inner cities who are economically disadvantaged do not have adequate access to care."

Incentives such as loan forgiveness programs aren't enough to keep new dentists in remote or low-income areas, he added. The average dental student graduates with several hundred thousand dollars of debt, he noted.

The Indian Health Service can't fill positions despite offering loan forgiveness and scholarships, Dr. Batliner pointed out. "It's not a long-term solution; dentists go there for a period of time to fulfill their obligation, then they leave," he said.

He attributes the opposition of the dental community to three factors. "I think it's about turf, money, and fear," Dr. Batliner said. "It's clear the old approach doesn't work, so what's their solution?"

Copyright © 2010 DrBicuspid.com

More states moving forward with midlevel providers, November 17, 2010

Kellogg responds to DHAT report concerns, November 1, 2010

ADHA applauds DHAT report, October 28, 2010

2-year study finds in favor of U.S. dental therapists, October 26, 2010

Two states, two perspectives on new workforce models, August 23, 2010


Last Updated kk 10/8/2012 11:41:00 AM

8 comments so far ...
12/8/2010 12:00:59 PM
Access
I continue to be disappointed that none of the presidents opposing the use of midlevels ever include any evidence to support their "feelings" that midlevels are undereducated or unsafe. they just seem to report "feelings". I would urge them to at least try to read the evidence supporting the use of midlevels. OR at least support the idea that we should have more research about the potential value of midlevels. Isn't dentistry supposed to be an evidence based health profession.
Frank Catalanotto, DMD
12/8/2010 12:41:19 PM
WhiteLake69
 If there is a study, in a refereed journal, showing risks to the public from dental therapists as part of dentist led teams, don't you think that the ADA, with all its resources, would have found it by now?Is dentistry a science or a religion? So far, all that opponents of therapists have thrown at the concept is their beliefs.

Two tiered system? Anyone been in a dental school or CHC lately? Sophomore through Senior dental students, PGY-1s, FDGs and faculty make up how many "tiers?" We have never complained about it before. On what tiers do you find EMS/EMT, Paramedics, PAs, NPs, CRNAs and others who make modern health care possible? Anyone out there ever refuse treatment by one of these?

Anyone for facts, or shall we keep praying quietly, hoping that we don't get caught up in the lie that dental therapists are a risk to the public?
12/8/2010 6:40:46 PM
belle
Ok, here it is. I am a practicing dentist as well as a volunteer faculty member at a local GPR. I feel that I did not learn enough in dental school or residency compared to previous generations (my father's). The students coming out now are learning even less. There simply is not enough time to learn all of the medicine to safely treat an ever growing medically complex baby boomer generation (and WW2) that is living longer and longer, while perfecting clinical dentistry. It takes time and a lot of practice to practice dentistry well. I am just starting to appreciate some of my own work, and when I see some work I did a few years ago I just cringe. It takes hours and hours and hours and hundreds of cavity preps to perfect engineering with your hands. Period.
12/8/2010 9:30:17 PM
paf
Quote from
But the fact is that people who live in rural areas or inner cities who are economically disadvantaged do not have adequate access to care


and adding more mid level providers will help the rural areas how??

It was all said [link=http://www.drbicuspid.com/index.aspx?sec=sup⊂=pmt&pag=dis&ItemID=305011]here[/link] - the economics of expenses associated with treatments don't change except for the salary of the person performing the dentist's work.

The model will first saturate urban areas - whoever thinks mid level providers will flock to small towns and low density areas is simply a dreamer. There will be some expansion of this profession into rural areas but it will be probably done by major dental groups (no names). And even then, they might struggle with finding people to work in "Timbuktu". Sadly, the distant will still have to travel miles to get treatment - because to open a "dental shop" in an area of [link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USA-2000-population-density.gif]25 heads per sq mile[/link] is just not feasible.

Since the practice model would require supervision, what might happen is that established dentists and dental groups might open new "points of service" and hire mid level providers effectively creating very strong pressure on new dental school graduates who struggle and accept working for portion of what already can be called "scraps". Let's keep in mind that it will be much easier for large conglomerates to spring up branches of dental care (like fast food restaurants) than your mom and pop dental practice (read: more pressure on the small business sector). For new GP graduates getting into dentistry by surviving on basic services will be much tougher because mid level provider will be lot cheaper than an associate. Ah, and all of this assumes that introduction of cheaper labor will not drive down the reimbursement fees for mid level provider services which would be yet another nail in the GP coffin.

I don't want to get ahead of myself but this has a potential for discouraging new GP students as it will be very painful to cope with mortgage sized school loans and compete with 50K a year mid level providers. And to even take this further (and I mean really far far from what's discussed and what's sane) -- take away the "state licensed dentist" requirement from the mid level provider supervision and you have overseas dentist in (fill in the country of your choice) reviewing and approving treatments for mid level providers - a dental outsourcing!

Why do I think this change in dental care model will not provide the desired solution but wreak havoc? But who am I to question the logic and the future....
1/25/2011 3:20:30 PM
CentralValleyDoc
Seems to me that 16 million dollars would go along ways towards solving the so-called "access to care" issue by increasing reimbursement rates for government programs and other incentives.  Like treat "X" number of truly disadvantaged patients and get "Y" tax credits.  Adding more therapists won't help the disadvantaged.  We don't have a lack of dentists, we have a maldistribution of dentists.  And in areas where there are dentists taking MediCaid patients (and we are talking about patients that don't pay for their care themselves, right?), why do those patients fail appointments and are non-compliant with preventive care? Yet they yakkity-yak on their I-phones when they do show up? Too much carrot and not enough stick, I say.
Email Printer Friendly

Sponsored By

|| 15 Minutes to Excellence || ADA News || Advertising || Ask Marty || Case Archives || Case Study || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || Education || Equipment For Sale || Facebook || Forums || Future of Dentistry || Home || Hygienist Resources || Jobs || Links || Mobile || News in Brief || Online CE || Opinion || Privacy Policy || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Video || XML/RSS ||

Copyright © 2013 DrBicuspid.com. All Rights Reserved.