Email Printer Friendly
Study finds wide geographic disparities in U.S. kids' oral health
By Donna Domino, Features Editor

February 16, 2011 -- The dental health of U.S. children will improve under the healthcare reform plan and through broader use of midlevel dental providers, but significant differences persist among states regarding insurance coverage, affordability, and preventive care, according to a report released February 2 by the Commonwealth Fund.

The report, "Securing a Healthy Future: The Commonwealth Fund State Scorecard of Child Health System Performance, 2011," examined U.S. states' performance on 20 key indicators of children's healthcare access, affordability of care, prevention, and treatment. It uses the same methodology as a 2008 Commonwealth Fund report on state variations in child health system performances, plus the Commonwealth Fund's general state health system scorecards. States are ranked relative to the performance of other states based on the most recent data available, typically from 2007 to 2009.

The new report found that children living in the five top-ranked states -- Iowa, Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire -- are more likely to be insured and receive recommended medical and dental checkups than children living in poorer performing states such as Florida, Texas, Arizona, Mississippi, and Nevada.

Minnesota ranked first in the "healthy lives" category as a result of low rates of infant and child mortality, obesity, dental problems (toothache, decayed teeth or cavities, broken teeth, or bleeding gums), and children at risk for developmental delays, while Arkansas, Mississippi, and the District of Columbia ranked last, with some of the worst rates on these indicators, according to the report.

“We are entering a new era in American healthcare.”
— Karen Davis, president,
     Commonwealth Fund

Nationwide, more than one-third (35%) of low-income children have not received recommended medical and dental visits, while only one in five higher-income children have not received such checkups, according to the report. Disparities in oral health problems also stand out: In the five states with the largest gaps by income, 43% of children in low-income families had toothaches, decayed teeth or cavities, broken teeth, or bleeding gums in the past six months, compared with 22% of children in higher-income families.

The Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Reauthorization Act of 2009 requires all CHIP programs to provide a comprehensive dental benefit package, the report noted. In addition, states can draw from CHIP funds to offer dental-only supplemental coverage for children who lack adequate dental coverage. However, findings indicate that simply including a benefit is not sufficient: States will need to address the supply of dental care, likely with workforce innovations to meet children's preventive and other oral health needs, the report noted.

"We are entering a new era in American healthcare," said Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis in a press release announcing the report. "We made a commitment to insuring children a decade ago through Medicaid and CHIP. Now we have not only redoubled those efforts, but also expanded that same protection to their parents through the Affordable Care Act, finally giving the entire family the best chance to be healthy and productive without fear of ruinous medical bills."

Preventive dental care

U.S. children miss about 1.6 million school days each year because of dental disease, the report noted. National health objectives, as set forth by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in its Healthy People 2010 initiative, include ensuring that children have a minimum of one dental visit each year. Despite this goal, performance remains uneven across states: Almost one-third of children did not see a dentist for a preventive visit in the bottom-ranked state (Florida), and more than 10% did not have a dental checkup in the top-ranked state (Hawaii).

Five states scored the highest for children who had the most preventive dental care visits: Hawaii, Rhode Island, Vermont, Connecticut, and Iowa.

Nationally, more than a third (35%) of children in families living below the poverty level did not have visits for medical and dental preventive care in 2007, compared with 21% of children in families with higher incomes, the report found.

More than 40% of poor children in the five bottom-ranked states (Nevada, Oregon, Colorado, Florida, and North Dakota) did not receive medical and dental preventive care visits, compared with 22% of poor children in the top four states (Rhode Island, Hawaii, New York, and West Virginia) and the District of Columbia.

Surprisingly, the report found that some minority children fare relatively better than white children in terms of receiving medical and dental preventive visits, with black children more likely to receive preventive visits in two-thirds of the states for which data are available. However, it was not the case for Hispanic children, who were much more likely than other children to go without routine preventive care.

Oral health problems

In 2007, more than one-quarter of children ages 1 to 17 (27%) had at least one of the following oral health problems within the past six months: decayed teeth or cavities, toothache, broken teeth, or bleeding gums, the report found.

Even in Minnesota, the state with the lowest rate of such problems, one out of every five children had oral health concerns. Unmet needs for dental care based on reports of pain and tooth decay or damage were highest in Arizona and Mississippi, where nearly one in three children had such oral health problems. In addition, parents who do not obtain dental care for themselves are less likely to bring their children in for dental care, the report found.

Children in low-income families have more than one-and-a-half times the prevalence of untreated cavities, pain, bleeding gums, or other dental problems than higher-income children in most states, according to the report. In addition, uninsured children are far more likely to live with oral health problems than those with insurance: Rates of such problems were two times higher among uninsured than privately insured children in some states.

Oral health problems are also more prevalent among children with public insurance than those with private insurance, the report noted. A government report found that publicly insured children often do not receive needed dental care, despite being substantially more likely to experience dental disease.

Low dentist participation in Medicaid and CHIP contributes to reduced dental access for low-income children, the study found. Increasing the availability of dental care for children through broader use of midlevel dental providers will likely be instrumental to ensure access to timely, affordable care in all communities, including rural and low-income areas, the report noted.

Notably, the report described Alaska's dental health aide therapist program as a success, serving as a model of how greater use of midlevel dental providers can improve children's access to dental services and the quality of care.

Millions of Medicaid kids still not getting dental care, December 1, 2010

Report: Many W.Va. kids don't get dental care, September 7, 2010

Calif. kids' oral health needs not being met, May 24, 2010

Pew report flunks 9 states on kids' dental care, February 23, 2010

States diverge in caring for the teeth of the poor, June 3, 2008


Copyright © 2011 DrBicuspid.com

Last Updated hh 2/16/2011 11:18:30 AM

7 comments so far ...
2/16/2011 5:26:54 PM
rw
Oh! Gee! You mean the same Commonwealth Fund that helped give us Obamacare? Seems to me like they are focusing on destroying the dental profession now that they were successful in destroying the doctor patient relationship in medicine.
Goerge Soros is busy destroying private industry in this nation using research from groups like the Commonwealth Fund. Google it for yourself. This group was instrumental in coming up with phony research to discredit the medical profession during the Obamacare debate. Get informed, get involved or socialized medicine will turn to socialized dentistry.

WAKE UP AMERICA!
2/16/2011 7:18:03 PM
jimecade
I treat many Medicaid children who get their teeth treated and some even practicing good dental hygiene. But when they hit 21 years of age, they stop seeing the dentist because of no insurance and they end up with severe dental problems just like their parents. Most of the parents of these children are in poor dental health. Unfortunately from my experience this is the rule, not the exception. Many of these kids do not have a strong family unit and are not taught to care for themselves. Although I like treating the kids and helping them, in the long run, programs such as dental Medicaid for these kids fail them as adults. The money spent  goes down the drain, and they are no better dental healthy as adults. Whether you have mid level providers or not, kids need to be taught the value of oral and over all physical health before any of these programs can be successful. The disparity I believe lies with the lack of family support of good dental health and not with government-funded programs. Both families with government financial support need to work together to get the job done.
2/18/2011 5:21:58 AM
WhiteLake69
By attacking The Commonwealth Fund, does it change the data, which reports wide discrepancy in access to dental care among America's children? We dentists have touted the importance of oral health for decades, going to great lengths to see to it that the traditionally served have access, access and more access, to everything we can cram into our offices. The latest in cad cam, bleaching, restorative materials and whatever newest technologies the industry has to offer. We have surpassed primary care physicians in annual income, according to ADA data, and work far fewer hours, for most of us with nothing more than four years of dental school and one state board exam.

We treat only who we want to. Thirty percent of the American public has ben under served since we began keeping records, back to the 1930s. They did not fit well into our model. The children of these people continue to suffer from oral diseases that we have essentially wiped out among those more like us.If they had impetigo, rather than oral disease, it would be considered a national disgrace.

That the RWs of of our health profession can only see conspiracies against their comfort zone is a sad commentary on how far many of us have drifted from being health professionals, how close to being mullahs.

We must challenge ourselves to ask the question, "How important are oral diseases?" Are we willing to risk anything in the interest of providing needed care for those who have not yet found access?"
2/18/2011 8:30:34 AM
paf
For one -- for dental care, I can tell you that the data is not considering the distribution and it takes the whole "population" numbers into account thus misrepresenting the situation - at least for the geographic area that i know.

Medicaid kids are highly sought patients in the circle of dentists i know -- and i know plenty of offices that offer Medicaid but just don't get enough medicaid kids in their clientèle. There is no access issue to Medicaid for kids here (where I live) -- as a matter of fact there is a significant amount of money spent by dentists to bring those patients to their practices. So quite contrary -- the poor kids have many provider choices and excellent benefits when compared to insured patients. There are offices that accept Medicaid and have availability (and plenty of it) in their schedules -- what's missing is the parents who are willing to take advantage of this FREE service. So where I live, this study is definitely a FAIL.
2/18/2011 9:06:04 AM
paf
@WhiteLake69

Quote from

We have surpassed primary care physicians in annual income, according to ADA data, and work far fewer hours, for most of us with nothing more than four years of dental school and one state board exam.

We treat only who we want to........
..........
..........
..........
That the RWs of of our health profession can only see conspiracies against their comfort zone is a sad commentary on how far many of us have drifted from being health professionals, how close to being mullahs.


This is not a personal attack but an observation - you are obviously on a level where many would like to be --- working few hours, treating only the people you want to treat, making a boat load of cash with a "measly" 4 years of education and a board exam... Nice! How do I get there? Where do I sign?

Just an observation -- the tone of your statement implies that you speak on behalf of the US dentists. I am not sure if you are fair and in a position to assume this role and what's concerning is how you choose to mis-portray dentists in your generalized statements.
Email Printer Friendly


|| 15 Minutes to Excellence || ADA News || Advertising || Ask Marty || Case Archives || Case Study || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || Education || Equipment For Sale || Facebook || Forums || Future of Dentistry || Home || Hygienist Resources || Jobs || Links || Mobile || News in Brief || Online CE || Opinion || Privacy Policy || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Video || XML/RSS ||

Copyright © 2013 DrBicuspid.com. All Rights Reserved.