Email Printer Friendly
CODA to set standards for U.S. dental therapist programs
By Donna Domino, Features Editor

August 9, 2011 -- The Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) has voted to set accreditation standards for dental therapy education programs in the U.S. The decision is in response to a request by the University of Minnesota, the first U.S. dental school to initiate such programs.

The commission -- which functions as an agency of the ADA -- estimates that the standards will take at least two years to develop.

In 2009, Minnesota became the first state in the U.S. to approve a law allowing midlevel dental practitioners, and seven women students have completed the two-year program to be licensed dental therapists and received master's degrees as oral healthcare practitioners.

After they have applied for and received their dental therapist license from the Minnesota Board of Dentistry, dental therapists will be allowed to perform basic preventive and restorative procedures and primary extractions only with the onsite supervision of a dentist. The Minnesota dental board has approved the program.

All the students plan to go on to become licensed advanced dental therapists after completing 2,000 hours of dental therapy clinical experience. Advanced dental therapists will able to practice at facilities such as nursing homes, within the dental therapy scope of practice. They will be able to perform nonsurgical extractions of mobile permanent teeth under a dentist's general supervision with a collaborative management agreement.

“We have new roles in healthcare today,” said Ann Leja, interim dean of nursing and health sciences at the Metropolitan State University in Minneapolis, where the dental therapist program is offered. “And like other health roles throughout the healthcare system, it is common to have a national accreditation body with the expectation that a program meets the standards.”

In a special alert sent out to ADA members today, the ADA confirmed that it remains "firmly opposed" to anyone other than a dentist diagnosing oral disease or performing surgical or irreversible procedures.

"We are making that clear on a continual basis, through our publications, our national legislative and regulatory advocacy, our support for state dental societies in their advocacy, and our statements to the profession, other stakeholders, the media, and the public at large," the association stated.

While CODA is an agency of the ADA, accreditation decisions, standard setting, and accreditation policy are solely under the commission's purview, as outlined in the ADA bylaws, the ADA added.

"CODA is recognized by the U.S. Department of Education [USDE] to accredit dental and dental-related education programs conducted at the postsecondary level. USDE criteria for recognition require the commission to have a stringent conflict of interest policy," the ADA stated.

CODA does not sanction programs, the ADA emphasized.

"Its functions include formulating and approving accreditation standards by which programs are evaluated; establishing policies and procedures for conducting the accreditation program; and determining and publicizing program accreditation status," the ADA stated. "In short, CODA's recent action is not an endorsement of dental midlevels. Rather, the commission viewed the request to set accreditation standards for programs of this type as in keeping with its mission to protect the public."

Conflict of interest?

Dental therapists receive more training in prepping and restoring teeth than dental schools require, according to Terry Batliner, DDS, a private practitioner in Denver who is also the associate director for the Center for Native Oral Health Research at the University of Colorado School of Public Health. Dr. Batliner is concerned that CODA's affiliation with the ADA, which has strongly opposed the concept of midlevel providers or nondentists performing surgical/irreversible procedures, may affect the group's ability to be objective.

“CODA and the ADA are tightly related in one organization, and that is a concern to me,” he told DrBicuspid.com. “Anybody that looks at the standards for dental therapist training should do so in the most objective fashion and not have a preconceived solution and not try to justify a preordained approach.”

Dr. Batliner was impressed by his firsthand observations of the dental health aide therapist (DHAT) program in Alaska.

"I have been to Alaska and looked at their training program for dental therapists, and I challenge anybody to go there and actually look at the program, look at the curriculum, look at the faculty, watch the therapists work, and find that it is not an appropriate solution for Alaska and perhaps many other locations," he said.

The dental therapist model first began in the 1920s in New Zealand and is now well-established in more than 40 countries. Last year the Kellogg Foundation released an evaluation of Alaskan DHATs that found that these midlevel providers offer safe and competent care to residents of remote and underserved native communities.

A report by the Pew Center on the States contends that private practice dentists can improve both their productivity and profitability by adding dental hygienists and dental therapists to their teams.

However, state dental associations across the U.S. have made it clear they oppose the concept of midlevel providers or nondentists performing surgical/irreversible procedures.

"The ADA has adopted an ongoing effort to educate all concerned that creating midlevel practitioners -- whether it occurs or not -- will not have an appreciable effect on improving the oral health of the millions of Americans who lack access to dental care," the association noted.

State dental boards can set the specific scopes of practice for the dentists and allied dental personnel over which the boards have jurisdiction, the ADA noted, and state dental boards can certify educational and training programs without accreditation by CODA.

CODA Chairman Donald Joondeph, DDS, will appoint a task force of dental educators and practitioners with experience in dental education to develop the new standards, and the task force will report to the commission on its progress at the August 2012 CODA meeting, the ADA said.

Drafts of the standards will go out for comment, which usually lasts a year, and includes open hearings at the ADA's annual meeting. CODA will then review the comments and may revise the proposed standards. If the revisions are significant, the draft standards may go out for comment for an additional year, the ADA noted.

ADA reaffirms stance on midlevel providers, June 10, 2011

ADA finds 'major flaws' in Pew midlevel provider report, March 7, 2011

Pew report finds economic upside to midlevel providers, December 7, 2010

More states moving forward with midlevel providers, November 17, 2010

Dentists' group aims to limit midlevel providers, May 18, 2010


Copyright © 2011 DrBicuspid.com

Last Updated hh 8/9/2011 2:35:37 PM

5 comments so far ...
8/9/2011 2:18:32 PM
WhiteLake69
Why not pilot the concept first? What type of training, how long, in what settings and for which populations, before CODA gets into determining educational standards? Can therapists be taught in community college settings, the least expensive, or do they need dental schools, the most costly place to teach auxiliary personnel? If recruiting therapists from target populations is important to long run success, how can it be accomplished? These and other questions need to be addressed before CODA does its thing.

My concern is that, given the makeup of CODA; dental schools, schools of hygiene and examiners will have a lot to say about therapists before much is known about how they might be utilized as new members of the team.
8/10/2011 11:36:46 AM
peddent
Lets look at this from what their (Mid level Providers) Goal is. It is to fill a notch group and treat the "under-served". That sounds great on paper but lets think, if they are under served in dental then most likely they will be under served medically too. What are the primary target groups they will be serving, children and the elderly. On a bell curve these two groups tend to have the highest percentage of medical problems. Will these patients be aware of their medical condition, will they be forthcoming and honest about it also? Will the Mid Level Provider be prepared to handle an office emergency in a rural area? "Simple" extractions are simple when they go as planed. We all had root tips break amongst other complications that were not foreseen. Are they going to be trained to scale and root plane. what will the malpractice be also. Why not bring back Denturists, they complete something that is totally reversible if done incorrectly. Then they talk about completing 2000 hours and becoming "master certified" or something like that. If that's the case why don't they just do the 4 years of dental school. What is really being saved. If they are subsidized by they state by the time they graduate you could have probably put some one through dental school and have them work 4-6 years as payback in a rural clinic.
8/10/2011 11:42:18 AM
S. Bornfeld
"The dental therapist model first began in the 1920s in New Zealand and is now well-established in more than 40 countries".

Just how many "pilot programs" do we need?
Conflict?  What conflict?  ;-)
8/10/2011 2:52:25 PM
WhiteLake69
While it may be difficult to accept, given how "radical" the concept may be, therapists with two years of formal training have safely and effectively performed the five or so skills which define them for many decades. The facts speak for themselves. That some may see bogeymen, there is no supporting evidence behind the great fears stated in this thread. None. Well credentialed dental faculty have looked at and attested to the quality of DT provided services. Patient and community satisfaction cannot be challenged, even by the most steadfast critics.

Teams incorporating dental therapists, targeted at poor and near poor, may not be every dentists cup of tea, which is certainly understandable. That does not justify attacks based upon nothing more than fear. If you can demonstrate risk to the public from DT based care, even the strongest supporters will back off. If all you have is blind opposition, don't expect to be taken seriously in the public arena.
8/10/2011 7:18:10 PM
sampson
Let me start out by stating that I may not necessarily opposed to a mid-level provider. I do have reservations and am not convinced by the data. For all the positive light given to mid-level providers in NZ and Alaska, I am concerned with recent statistics about the rate of early childhood caries in NZ that may put a dent in claims of the wonderful success in NZ.

I must disagree with WhiteLake69 regarding CODA. It is well-accepted among health care professions to have accreditation agencies and licensing boards. In Minnesota, the Board of Dentistry will license dental therapists and require them to take a clinical exam. (http://www.dentalboard.state.mn.us/Portals/3/Rules/ProposedRulesADT041811.pdf) These function to protect the public, ensure that appropriate educational standards are met and that there is quality control in the educational process.

For medical schools in the United States and Canada, the LCME (Liaison Committee on Medical Education) accredits medical schools and their training programs. The make up of the LCME is from the AMA and Association of American Medical Colleges. For nursing, there appear to be a few accreditation agencies.

For PA's (http://arc-pa.org/about/index.html), the accreditation agency works in cooperation with multiple medical organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics, AMA, American Academy of Family Physicians and American College of Physicians. "The development of the Essentials of an Accredited Educational Program for the Assistant to the Primary Care Physician was undertaken by the American Medical Association (AMA) Subcommittee of the Council on Medical Education’s Advisory Committee on Education for Allied Health Professions and Services. The Subcommittee included representatives from the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Physicians (ACP), American Society of Internal Medicine (ASIM), American Medical Association (AMA), and Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The Essentials prepared by the Subcommittee were approved by those organizations except for the AAMC, which declined to approve or endorse the Essentials." (source http://arc-pa.org/about/arc_history.html). CODA is responsible for accrediting dental schools and graduate dental programs as well as dental-related programs such as dental hygiene.

Using PA's as an example, the initial accreditation commission was initiated and composed of representatives from physician organizations. (I use PA's as an example, as many who advocate for MLP's use PA's as their example for an equivalence in the medical field.) I would put forward the thesis that dentists, hygienists and assistants work more closely as a team than physicians and nurses and medical assistants. This is largely because of the diversity of the places of care (e.g. large and small clinics, hospitals, surgicenters, etc.) as well as the nature of medical care itself, where nurses are sometimes not directly reporting to the doctor, especially in the hospital. The concept of teamwork in the medical setting is in its infancy compared to the dental setting. Hygienists and assistants may disagree with me, but working in both hospital as well as clinic settings, the dental team functions more efficiently, minimizes patient waiting and can increase the number of patients seen in a day (a piece of the access picture that perhaps would be worse without the dental team).

Currently, the dentist is the team leader. In the hospital or clinic setting, there are often multiple teams within that setting, many with different agendas and I have personally seen this decrease care efficiency, quality and slower progress in achieving better care.

I guess my point is that dentists should continue to be the team leader. They also have the most experience in understanding dental training. If we don't entrust this to the people with the most experience providing direct patient care, to whom do we entrust this too? The Alaska DT's? Someone from NZ? I think we stop throwing out this conflict of interest term out so easily. I have known people who have served on CODA and they have all been fair, ethical people who can look with a critical eye to ensure that programs are meeting key, essential requirements to ensure adequate education of students.
Email Printer Friendly


|| 15 Minutes to Excellence || ADA News || Advertising || Ask Marty || Case Archives || Case Study || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || Education || Equipment For Sale || Facebook || Forums || Future of Dentistry || Home || Hygienist Resources || Jobs || Links || Mobile || News in Brief || Online CE || Opinion || Privacy Policy || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Video || XML/RSS ||

Copyright © 2013 DrBicuspid.com. All Rights Reserved.