Email Printer Friendly
Debate over ADA Library cuts not over yet
By Mary J. Hayes, DDS, MS, AM, DrBicuspid.com contributing writer

November 14, 2012 -- "Limbo" is a concept left over from my Catholic grade school education. Limbo officially does not exist anymore, but what a great idea: a place where everything is neither up nor down, neither here nor there. It's a place of suspension, where you are neither saved nor cursed. Yet.

The ADA Library is currently in limbo.

The ADA House of Delegates (HOD) met last month in San Francisco. Structurally, the ADA Board of Trustees (BOT) and administration perform the work of the ADA at the request of the House of Delegates. At the annual meeting, the HOD lets them know if they have been doing a good job. Their work is reviewed and charges are assigned for the next year.

At this year's meeting, a budget was presented to the House of Delegates that included a 60% cut of monies allocated to the ADA Library. The ADA Board of Trustees and administration went through a long and detailed process to cull out programs that were financially underperforming, and the library was found to be an especially large black hole; in fact, it was judged by the BOT and the administration to be a money pit.

Mary J. Hayes, DDS, MS, AM
Mary J. Hayes, DDS, MS, AM.

It has been stated that the financial stability of the ADA was undermined by the library's cost, as less than 1% of the members actually "use" the library. Clearly, an unacceptable return on investment.

But ADA members and friends of the ADA Library took the Board of Trustees and administration to task. Two opportunities were used to inform the House of Delegates that the fate of the library was in their hands and to give them an opportunity to reverse the gutting of the library.

First, testimony regarding the library was presented at the Reference Committee (RC) on Dental Education. Specifically, Resolution 159 was discussed regarding the status of the library within the ADA structure: Is the library of value to the members? Should the library be funded properly? Should the physical collection be packed up, tossed, or "burned"? Should members be allowed to come to the library to work? Should members be allowed to read the books, use the journals, and be assisted by the professional staff?

During this discussion, the line at the microphone was long, with members gathered from all over the country stating that the Board of Trustees and the administration had gone too far. Does it matter that 1% of ADA members use the library when their work product clearly enhances the professional lives of 100% of all ADA members? What about the projects that the library expedites for ADA departments to the direct benefit of members, such as Science, Publishing, and IT?

Modernize the library, of course, but don't strip the function of the special and unique library of the ADA. According to written testimony by Julie Schiavo of the Medical Library Association that was submitted to the Reference Committee, "There is a common misperception that the Internet and electronic collections provide sufficient resources to meet the information needs of the healthcare community and money will be saved if there is a minimal or no physical library collection. This is not true. Digital resources in dentistry lag behind those in other health professions. The unique collection of the ADA Library provides access to patient care information that is not available through electronic means or is only available at a very high cost to the requestor."

The Reference Committee decided that the information and passion they heard justified an RC Resolution, 159RC, to be presented to the entire House of Delegates. Resolution 159RC states that the ADA Library would maintain its physical space and collection for 2013, and that an internal report on the status of the library would be given next year to the 2013 HOD.

ADA's core values

Now the time came for the next go around: the official meeting of the House of Delegates. The ADA Library was but one of many, many topics up for discussion.

The first place it came up was under the budget. The HOD considers the budget separately from individual topics and as presented, the library was defunded. Reconsideration almost happened, but as other issues came up it was voted to leave the 60% cuts for the library in place.

The agenda eventually came to the section on Dental Education business, and the Reference Committee presented Resolution 159RC. Bear in mind that 159RC specifically did not ask for the library's funding to be restored.

Districts 8 and 11 tried to introduce a Substitute Resolution to restore the library's budget, while a special committee would report back to the HOD a targeted strategy to align the functions of the library with membership and organizational needs.

But at the end of the day, Resolution 159RC was passed instead, putting the library in limbo: The collection will not be removed, but more than half of the library staff will be fired as of January 1, 2013. Books will no longer be bought nor lent, 20% to 25% of journal subscriptions are to be discontinued for lack of funds, five librarians will be left to do the work of 13 people, and members will no longer be permitted to "walk in" and use the library.

“The ADA Library is not just a book collection. It is information services, facilitated by a highly trained and professional staff.”

Which brings us to core values. When Kathleen O'Loughlin, DMD, MPH, addressed the House of Delegates as the association's executive director, she set the tone of the meeting by urging HOD members to support the core values of the ADA, specifically education, advocacy, and trust. These values are basic to improve the professional status of dentists, align actions that build value for the ADA, encourage the health of the public, and promote the art and science of dentistry. Dentistry is science-based and, as an association, science informs our strategy to make the right things happen.

Core values help a group such as the ADA grow and transition to the next level without losing focus, purpose, or professionalism. So does closing the ADA Library reflect positively the association's core values? Of course not. In this age of electronic communication, the need for dentistry to be grounded in science and evidence-based research only increases. Facile navigation in the increasingly complex world of information is challenging for the best of us. The skill set of the ADA librarians is needed to guide us efficiently in the dental literature for study, writing, lobbying, lecturing, research, and lifelong learning. It is all about education, advocacy, and trust.

The ADA Library is not just a book collection. It is information services, facilitated by a highly trained and professional staff. It is people who are uniquely knowledgeable about dentistry, whose business for 85 years has been the nuances of our profession's literature and knowledge base. Perhaps the ADA librarians have made it look too easy. How about an overheard suggestion that the "overpaid" librarians be replaced by clerks? Processing journal requests is just copying and filing, right? Ironic, isn't it? I've heard that dentists are "overpaid" for their professional work as well and that midlevel providers make more economic sense.

Time to take action

How does the ADA Library get out of limbo? Can it be saved?

The Board of Trustees meets in early December, and word is that the library will be discussed. Could the librarians be kept on to do their work? Could monies be restored to keep the journal subscriptions from being cut 20% to 25%? Could a strategic plan for the library's future be developed?

Of course the BOT can re-examine its actions. Join your colleagues and become a Friend of the Library. Let the ADA board know you are concerned that the library has been dismantled without a measured plan in place to meet the needs of the ADA's history and future. Hopefully, they will be sensitive to the dismay that so many members have expressed regarding the library's defunding and lack of a business plan going forward.

Transparency is another core value of the ADA ...

BTW: Money talks. As previously reported, the House of Delegate approved dues at $522 per member, an increase of $10, or less than 2%. The 2013 budget passed anticipating a surplus of $1.1 million: $119.7 million in revenue with anticipated expenses of $118.6 million.

Hmmm ... it would seem that the library could have had some, if not all, of its cuts restored after all ($660,000) without jeopardizing the financial stability of the association.

Dr. Mary J. Hayes attended the University of Illinois College of Dentistry, where she earned her Doctor of Dental Surgery and a Master of Science and Certificate of Advanced Study in Pediatric Dentistry. Before her career in dentistry, Dr. Hayes received a Master of Medical Library Science from the University of Chicago. She has spoken all over the world to professional groups about pediatric dentistry and dental education. She has been the recipient of many professional honors, including the Cushing Award from the Chicago Dental Society in honor of her leadership in oral health education. She is a diplomate of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry and serves the board as an examiner.

ADA to cut services at Chicago library, October 24, 2012

ADA should think twice about dismantling library, October 16, 2012


Copyright © 2012 DrBicuspid.com

Last Updated kk 11/14/2012 12:58:14 PM

10 comments so far ...
11/14/2012 12:27:41 PM
isavesmiles
Unfortunately this HOD definitely forgot the core values stated by Dr. O'Loughlin. She stated that one of the core values was trust yet the HOD did not trust the Committee G, CDEL , the BOT nor the reference committee for Education when they voted to support the recognition of Anesthesiology as a specialty. I guess we need to rework all the committees, councils, and BOT to live up to the "trust" needed for the HOD. A true disgrace.
11/14/2012 2:40:18 PM
Dishyork
First of all, during the BOT budget meetings there was an assumption that there would be a significant shortfall. At the 11th hour there was a discovery that this year's budget would not be as dire as predicted.  But, there is no question our revenues are decreasing and as our membership ages it will become more serious. The BOT acted in a responsible way and looked for programs that were not utilized by the membership. I am not arguing pro or con the Library. But, I will tell you that at every Reference Committee hearing that I attended, the lines at the microphone on every program that the BOT wanted to reduce or eliminate were long.  The lines were all at the "con" microphones and they were almost all made up of folks whose "ox was being gored". If we were talking about eliminating a Council, then all of the Council members and previous Council members spoke against it. We have to streamline. We spent $300K for a study and then didn't follow most of their suggestions. The Library is just one of the cost cutting moves that will have "friends" who want to save it. I want to save the ADA. Lets live responsibly
11/14/2012 3:02:45 PM
LighthouseDave
  The hyperbole of burning books is unwarranted.  The library will be intact and scholars will still be able to use the faciliites and services.  What will end is the walk-in service off the street for non-members and the public at large.  Members will still have access to and be able to conduct research in depth.  The number of librarians will be reduced but the HOD followed the recommendation of the Board on that action as they had carefully looked at the use factor as well as ADA core value consideration.  To imply this was a callous, disconsiderate and blunderous act is false.  The HOD members are us, all HOD delegates are ADA member dentists who have the best interests of the profession in mind and the experience to weigh thoughful debate.  They do not profit from any decisions made and have no vested or conflict of interest in their votes.  Perhaps it would enhance your article if offered opposing reasoning, but that would require the loss of hyperbole and true consideration of fiscal realities for the long term ADA health.  Thoughful reasoning was presented to the RC and the HOD, at both the pro and the con mikes. 
11/14/2012 5:54:25 PM
BloomChicago
Dishyork, Lighthouse Dave, and anybody else that believes we cannot afford to maintain the ADA Library:

Let's start with fiscal realities: the library was costing us about $12 per member... it consumed 1% of the 2012 ADA budget. It is a direct member benefit... one of the few things where we can offset what we pay in dues with actual goods and services that we get out (via book loans, journal articles and reference pkgs).
 
In another sense, it serves the entire profession. If only 1% of members are the article writers, book authors, course preparers and lecturers, researchers, etc. then so be it. Members that don't routinely use the library, please understand those of us that do use it... it is there for us all.
 
If 1% use the library and the library costs just 1% of the budget, I don't see anything inherently wrong with that. We are not so destitute as to not be able to afford our library as it was.
 
Spence
11/14/2012 8:57:21 PM
BloomChicago
Quote from LighthouseDave


  The hyperbole of burning books is unwarranted.  The library will be intact and scholars will still be able to use the faciliites and services.  What will end is the walk-in service off the street for non-members and the public at large.  Members will still have access to and be able to conduct research in depth.  The number of librarians will be reduced but the HOD followed the recommendation of the Board on that action as they had carefully looked at the use factor as well as ADA core value consideration.  To imply this was a callous, disconsiderate and blunderous act is false.  The HOD members are us, all HOD delegates are ADA member dentists who have the best interests of the profession in mind and the experience to weigh thoughful debate.  They do not profit from any decisions made and have no vested or conflict of interest in their votes.  Perhaps it would enhance your article if offered opposing reasoning, but that would require the loss of hyperbole and true consideration of fiscal realities for the long term ADA health.  Thoughful reasoning was presented to the RC and the HOD, at both the pro and the con mikes. 

Lighthouse Dave,
  Would you feel differently about the library if you found out you were mistaken? Here are the facts. If you don't believe me call the library and ask.
1- ADA leadership specified to the librarians that ADA members will no longer be able to enter the library. You have bad info... verrrry bad info.
2- If you believe that the library's budget cut and staff cut was based on any analysis of library services, etc. then you are entirely mistaken... there was no study to find out if the basic functions of the ADA could be carried out with the budget allowed. Because they did no analysis or study beforehand, and because they did not consult with the librarians themselves, we now find these after-effects: book buying and book loans are cut out, ~20% of the journal subscriptions  will be cut because of lack of funds, the 5 librarians have no support staff to answer phones, do photcopying, etc (The equivalent of us firing our assistants and having to do it ALL ourselves.) There are other after-effects, but these are the main ones.
3- At the RC con mike were the following opinions: 1- "Everything we need is available online". Oh, really? Are the latest books on cosmetic dentistry, tmd, perio surgery, implant surgery and reconstruction, practice management, etc. available online??? Would you rather purchase each and every book, or borrow them for just the cost of shipping? Would you rather purchase a journal article online for $20-45 per article... the ADA library provides them for $7, except now the turnaround time will be unknown because the 5 librarians have to balance their time between servicing the ADA itself and servicing the dues-paying members while working without assistants. 
2- "If only 1% use the library, then it isn't worth keeping it."
(see above comment about how 1% affects us all; also how it only costs $12/member - less than a meal. If a member dentist said it would help them if you bought them 1 meal a year, would you go ballistic on him/her?? Also, there was nothing stopping you from borrowing books, etc. to get your money's worth out of the library... but the library is currently on death row... it needs a reprieve from our governors... if not, then you and the rest of the 99% will never get the opportunity to get benefit of the ADA Library!)
3- "Because there is no plan for what to do with the book collection, it should be studied."
--------That is it... there were 3 "con" arguments at Reference committee-----------

The book burning analogy is not inappropriate. As of Jan. 1, 2013, none of our book collection will be available to us. If you want to see any of the new or old books, you will be out of luck... find it elsewhere... the ability to use the books we own will be stripped 100%... so to consider them burned up isn't different enough to argue about. If burning the books sounds upsetting, then so should their being locked out of our grasp.
 
From what you wrote, I'd guess you didn't know the entire story... what do you say now?
 
The resolution to restore the library's budget was defeated. The substitute resolution to restore the budget and study the future of the library was defeated. Then resolution 159RC was passed and the budget was not mentioned, therefore the cut stayed in effect. The only concession made in 159RC was that "appropriate agencies" could have time to figure out what to do with the book collection that will sit idle until then. The article should not be faulted because you, and others, don't like what it says about the coming changes. Friends of the library know that the discrepency between what members are losing compared to the money saved (0.6% of the budget) is too huge to sit still. If the BOT and Exec Director's minds cannot be changed soon, the rest of the members will soon find out: "We was robbed!"
 
Spencer Bloom

Email Printer Friendly


|| 15 Minutes to Excellence || ADA News || Advertising || Ask Marty || Case Archives || Case Study || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || Education || Equipment For Sale || Facebook || Forums || Future of Dentistry || Home || Hygienist Resources || Jobs || Links || Mobile || News in Brief || Online CE || Opinion || Privacy Policy || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Video || XML/RSS ||

Copyright © 2013 DrBicuspid.com. All Rights Reserved.