Email Printer Friendly
ADHA responds to questions about ADHP model
By Pam Quinones, RDH

April 10, 2012 -- I read with interest the article posted last week on DrBicuspid.com by Jay W. Friedman, DDS, MPH, entitled "Is the ADHA midlevel provider model fair to hygienists?"

Clearly, the issue of midlevel oral health providers is complex, and there are many different potential solutions and workforce models being proposed to address the access to care crisis. I do feel, however, that there are a few points that Dr. Friedman raises about the American Dental Hygienists' Association's (ADHA) advanced dental hygiene practitioner (ADHP) model that I must address.

Pam Quinones American Dental Hygienists' Association
Pam Quinones, RDH, president, American Dental Hygienists' Association

We need to clarify that the Minnesota advanced dental therapy (ADT) program considered and used the ADHP educational competencies, and other dental education competencies, when developing the curriculum.

Metropolitan State University has established a master's program that combines both the basic level of dental therapist education and the additional education/training needed to be an ADT. Students in this program will meet licensed requirements as a dental therapist as part of the longer curriculum that will lead to advanced practice certification after 2,000 hours of clinical practice as a dental therapist.

The educational framework for the Metropolitan State masters program is broader in breadth and depth than the legislation. Students are educated to not only perform specific oral health procedures competently, but to be competent in the care management, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills that are necessary for enhanced clinical judgment.

The integrated curriculum weaves preparation for enhanced clinical judgment throughout the 26 months. Public health, research and scholarship, clinical practice management, academic leadership, and advanced clinical skills are emphasized, practiced, and evaluated during the program. Competencies for the program were developed using ADHP competencies, ADEA competencies for the New General Dentist, and the ADA's Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) Standards for Dental Education for the scope of practice being proposed.

Metropolitan State admission requirements are that applicants must have a baccalaureate degree and be licensed dental hygienists. The law establishes the requirements for licensure of dental therapists and certification of ADTs, but does not dictate to the educational institutions what their admission requirements should be or how to structure their programs.

Different educational institutions may establish different types of programs as long as the programs appropriately educate students to the necessary level of competency. Integrating dental hygiene with dental therapy will allow for an increase in primary oral health care services and keep health promotion and disease prevention as the primary focus of this new practitioner.

Dr. Friedman expressed his concern about the education level required to become an ADHP. He wrote: "To enter the ADHP's two-year master's degree program, one must first have a four-year baccalaureate degree in dental hygiene. This extends the ADHP program to six academic years, compared to the proven success of training a dental therapist with a high school diploma in only two years."

The ADHP concept was first developed with the nurse practitioner educational model in mind. Patient safety and welfare was always our priority. While much attention has been paid to the clinician aspect of midlevel providers, our intent was to create a healthcare provider that functioned in a variety of roles, such as a researcher, administrator, etc. In fact, it is the comprehensive education they will receive that we feel will allow them to best serve the public in a variety of roles.

The ADHA believes that patients will benefit the most from mid-level providers who are rooted in dental hygiene, as dental hygiene-based providers can deliver both preventive and restorative care within a defined scope of practice. In fact, the ADT program in Minnesota has a unique benefit of graduating students with dual licenses -- a dental hygiene license and a dental therapy license -- making them effective in two roles of the dental team.

The ADHA believes that any mid-level provider model should include three important criteria:

  • Licensure
  • Graduation from an accredited education program
  • The ability to provide services directly to the public

Since the issue of mid-level dental providers began, we have seen a variety of models emerge, including a blended dental hygiene/dental therapy three-year model as Dr. Friedman describes. The ADHA supports this type of workforce model, as it is indeed rooted in dental hygiene and supports a collaborative working relationship with dentists.

I would like to clarify that the ADHA is open and receptive to workforce models in addition to the ADHP model. We simply do not need to force a choice, as Dr. Friedman states, "What is gained in dental therapy is lost in periodontal therapy."

We can have both! A midlevel provider who has the education and training of a dental hygienist and a dental therapist is the best of both worlds, and no one has to choose between restorative services and periodontal services. ADHA has long been a proponent of exploring new workforce models in dentistry and has been an advocate for a number of different provider proposals.

Dr. Friedman also puts forth the idea that, as many dental hygienists pursue the midlevel provider career choice, they will leave the traditional clinical dental hygiene workforce shorthanded. He wrote: "Dental hygienists becoming dental therapists is like a zero-sum game. From the viewpoint of alleviating the dental workforce shortage, it is a wash."

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the employment of dental hygienists is expected to grow by 38% from 2010 to 2020. This is much faster than the average for all occupations. In fact, with 334 entry-level dental hygiene educational programs now accredited by CODA, and with some areas of the country seeing a near saturation level of dental hygienists, new provider models and practice settings stand to benefit from a pool of ready, licensed, and highly educated dental hygienists without causing any shortage in the typical dental office setting.

We certainly thank Dr. Friedman for continuing the dialogue on new provider models, and we agree with him that the need to expand the dental workforce is undeniable. It is through the continued discussion with key stakeholders that eventually we will be able to address the oral healthcare needs of this country.

Pam Quinones, RDH, BS, is president of the American Dental Hygienists' Association.

NYT op-ed piece supports dental therapists, April 9, 2012

Is the ADHA midlevel provider model fair to hygienists?, April 6, 2012

More U.S. states consider expanding hygienists' duties, March 22, 2012

Midlevel providers face uphill battle for acceptance, March 22, 2012

Dentists, hygienists debate role of 'midlevel provider', November 17, 2008


Copyright © 2012 DrBicuspid.com

Last Updated kk 4/10/2012 11:45:54 AM

11 comments so far ...
4/13/2012 9:18:51 PM
txlonghorn
"While much attention has been paid to the clinician aspect of midlevel providers, our intent was to create a healthcare provider that functioned in a variety of roles, such as a researcher, administrator, etc. In fact, it is the comprehensive education they will receive that we feel will allow them to best serve the public in a variety of roles."
 
Why not just spend an extra two years and attend dental school. This would provide you the ability to provide comprehensive care to all patients. Also, how will these programs help solve the "access to care" problem? Will these practitioners be forced to move to rural areas to practice? If they are not, then the problem of distribution of care will remain. Also, how will clinics in these areas that do not have care be supported? Running a clinic is very expensive, and I am not sure that a community of a few hundred in rural areas can support the cost of running clinics.
 
If you really look at the problem with dentistry, it is a problem with the distribution of dentist - major cities have many and rural areas have few. Another point is that many rural areas cannot support dental offices - no enough patient to cover the costs of running a dental clinic. Moreover, there are several new dental schools that are opening up. I believe that about 5 or more are being constructed.
 
 
5/9/2012 4:13:03 PM
OH Advocate
Unfortunately, many people such as yourself are unable to think outside of the box, and only see things as they are.
Many opportunities are available to access care in rural locations, most easily within community health clinics that are already established. Interdisciplinary or collaborative care is a fact for the future, combining clinics a natural progression.
Mobile or portable clinics are also a easy solution in accessing many locations without needing to dedicate resources to a traditional dental operatory or clinic.
Many people in metropolitan locations are also underserved due to financial limitations. Having providers available to care for these people who have none available at this time is something to be looked toward accomplishing.
5/15/2012 11:29:38 AM
txlonghorn
All you have provided are different ways/areas a practitioner can provide care. Those are all valid points. However, it still does not address the problem of providing comprehensive care. Dentist are trained and can provide comprehensive care vs. ADHP, who would provide only limited care. Again, with only two additional years, an ADHP can become a dentist. Why not just attend dental school and then work to provide care to the underserved? 
5/24/2012 4:20:11 AM
konarocky
Quote from txlonghorn


All you have provided are different ways/areas a practitioner can provide care. Those are all valid points. However, it still does not address the problem of providing comprehensive care. Dentist are trained and can provide comprehensive care vs. ADHP, who would provide only limited care. Again, with only two additional years, an ADHP can become a dentist. Why not just attend dental school and then work to provide care to the underserved? 

The choice is often 2 years vs 4 to 5 years for dental school.  Many hygienists already have a BA/BS degree, but still need additional pre-reqs (physics, biology, chemistry, etc).  The ADHP programs will fully accept credits earned from hygiene degrees while dental schools often don't.  Sacrificing another 2 or 3 years is a huge difference for older students or those who have financial obligations (a.k.a. family, etc.).    
7/5/2012 3:54:34 AM
Krisminand
Reply to OH Advocate:
 
You took the words right out of my mouth.  The modes of delivery of care that you discussed; especially within existing FQHC, WIC centers, Community Centers utilizing portable units when necessary.  This is normal for those in dental hygiene, it is the way we have been taught to function in public health settings.  
Additionally, you don't have to go to rural areas to find volumes of underserved individuals.  They are in the heart of major cities.  These are clients that traditionally do not seek or receive care in private practices.
To answer the question from another post "why not just go to dental school for two more years and be able to help everyone".  I find that offensive, I love dental hygiene and have gained knowledge in areas such as healthcare management, research, and public health advocacy and delivery of care.  I already have a MSDH but would be willing to pay for and endure the additional educational requirements of the mid level provider models to be able to work in these settings.
Regarding those who are against the hygiene based mid-level provider model (and have done the research personally into the educational, clinical, and existing background of the candidates) I have one question:  the dental profession has been calling the shots since the beginning of time and dental healthcare is in crisis whether or not they want to admit it.  The status quo must go and all those who do not want to be part of the solution can keep working in private practice undisturbed.
Email Printer Friendly


|| 15 Minutes to Excellence || ADA News || Advertising || Ask Marty || Case Archives || Case Study || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || Education || Equipment For Sale || Facebook || Forums || Future of Dentistry || Home || Hygienist Resources || Jobs || Links || Mobile || News in Brief || Online CE || Opinion || Privacy Policy || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Video || XML/RSS ||

Copyright © 2013 DrBicuspid.com. All Rights Reserved.