When treating patients with peri-implantitis, it is crucial to avoid damaging the surface of the implant and increasing bacterial resistance, as some existing decontaminants do. Researchers wanted to see if an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (Waterlase iPlus, Biolase) was an effective alternative treatment (Materials, June 27, 2019).

The group used 50 microtextured treatment implants (tapered screw-vent MTX, Zimmer Biomet) with a rough surface for the study. The implants have a uniform surface of closely spaced micropits, the researchers noted.

Half of the implants were contaminated with Acinetobacter baumannii and the other half with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. They divided the implants into five groups for decontamination comparison:

• In the first group, decontamination was done with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm).
• In the second group, decontamination was done using a 650-nm diode laser.
• In the third group, decontamination was done using a different photodynamic therapy (an 808-nm diode laser).
• In the fourth group, decontamination was done with 0.12% chlorhexidine.
• The fifth group was the control group with no decontamination.

The researchers viewed the implants under a scanning electron microscope after decontamination. They also counted the number of colony forming units on the implants (see table below). The Er,Cr:YSGG laser showed the best results in decontaminating the implant surface.

A significant difference was observed between the Er,Cr:YSGG laser group and the other groups, the researchers reported. Chlorhexidine proved to be better in decontaminating the implant surface than either of the diode laser groups. Scanning electron microscope analysis showed no significant change in the implant surface topography.

The researchers noted several study limitations:

• This was an in vitro study.
• Only a single setting was used on the laser. A different setting might determine an optimal setting limit for use without surface damage to the implant.
• Only a single implant surface was used. The authors recommended further research using different implant surfaces to examine the efficacy of the recommended laser settings.

The group concluded that the laser was a useful treatment option.

"The Er,Cr:YSGG laser is an effective alternative treatment modality for decontamination of dental implant surfaces without damaging the surface topography," the authors concluded, led by Adel Alagl, BDS, DSc, of the department of preventive dental sciences at the College of Dentistry at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University in Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

With lasers, there's hope for peri-implantitis treatment
Much like endosseous titanium implants changed the realm of implant dentistry, advances in technology hold the key to solving one of today's most pressing...

5 questions patients ask about gum disease
Periodontist Dr. Alvin Danenberg receives questions from patients all over the world about gum disease. While patients' specific conditions vary,...

Er:YAG lasers change dentin's surface, chemical composition
Hard-tissue lasers have been praised as a replacement to drills for basic restorative procedures, which is why researchers decided to take a closer look...

Are lasers effective for dentin hypersensitivity?
Using lasers to treat dentin hypersensitivity is a fairly new proposition. How well do they work? A meta-analysis of available data by researchers at...