Second Opinion: Ga. must correct dental care disparities

2016 07 12 14 41 48 736 Serban Nicoleta 200

More than 58% of Georgia's children -- about 1.5 million youngsters -- qualify for public dental benefits through the state's Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids programs, according to a new study by the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). Unfortunately, of the 3,872 licensed dentists providing provide preventive services in Georgia, just 337 -- 8.7% -- accept public insurance for children, according to

Nicoleta Serban, PhD.Nicoleta Serban, PhD.

Research conducted by scientists in the Health Analytics Group at Georgia Tech details the extreme oral healthcare disparities between children eligible for public insurance and those whose families can afford care through other financial means.

Considering common access barriers, roughly 865,000 Medicaid- or PeachCare-eligible children in Georgia need to travel more than the state standards to reach a dental provider for preventive care services. The standards are driving distances to a provider of 30 minutes or 30 miles for urban areas and 45 minutes or 45 miles for rural areas.

They also must travel, on average, 10 or more miles farther than children with private insurance or ability to afford of out-of-pocket care expenses to reach a dental provider.

The study also found that the parents of more than 500,000 children in Georgia will probably forgo preventive dental care for their children because of the lack of financial means to pay for out-of-pocket care or lack of public or private insurance.

To address the problem, the study found that 30% of Georgia dentists (a total of 1,160) would have to accept public insurance to achieve state standards for access to care for almost 100% of Medicaid-eligible children in large cities and approximately 85% in smaller urban and rural areas.

To provide dental care for these children at "equitable levels" with those whose parents can afford the care would require that 50% of Georgia dentists accept public insurance reimbursement.

Tooth decay is the No. 1 childhood chronic disease, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It not only results in pain and lack of concentration, but also can result in facial disfiguration from swelling, nutritional deficiencies from inability to chew, and potentially deadly infection. Lack of access to dental care also leads to missed school days for children and missed work days for their parents.

“An urgent plan of action is needed to ensure lower-income Georgia children receive the oral healthcare they so desperately need.”

The Georgia Tech research shows that an urgent plan of action is needed to ensure lower-income Georgia children receive the oral healthcare they so desperately need.

Among the strategies to reduce oral health disparities among lower-income children, the researchers propose providing grants to health centers that provide dental services, increasing Medicaid acceptance rates among dentists, and offering dentists federal assistance for dental school loans if they agree to relocate to dental shortage areas.

One strategy highlighted by the researchers was the focus of legislation proposed during the 2016 Georgia General Assembly session. The legislation would have enabled licensed dental hygienists to provide essential preventive dental care, such as fluoride treatment and applying sealants, without direct supervision of dentists, which is defined as requiring a dentist to be present onsite for the procedures.

The legislation would have expanded that policy, which applies now to prisoners and those seen at public health dental sites, to include state-insured children and underserved people in nursing homes, federally qualified health centers, and nonprofit healthcare facilities. Unfortunately, the measure met opposition from dentists and died in the House Rules Committee.

Nicoleta Serban, PhD, is a Coca-Cola Associate Professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology School of Industrial and Systems Engineering and the author of the study mentioned in this Second Opinion.

This commentary first appeared on the website of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation. is grateful for the opportunity to reprint this essay.

The Georgia Public Policy Foundation is an independent think tank that proposes market-oriented approaches to public policy to improve the lives of Georgians. Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the view of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before the U.S. Congress or the Georgia Legislature.

The comments and observations expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the opinions of, nor should they be construed as an endorsement or admonishment of any particular idea, vendor, or organization.

Latest in Federally Qualified Health Center
Page 1 of 19
Next Page